Report the data — accurately, and in your own structure.

The line graph illustrates how many people, in millions, visited three museums in London — the British Museum, the National Gallery and the Tate Modern — over a ten-year period from 2010 to 2020. Overall, visitor numbers rose at all three museums across the decade, with the British Museum remaining the most popular throughout. The Tate Modern, however, saw the steepest growth and closed the gap on its rivals by 2020. In 2010, the British Museum attracted around 5.8 million visitors, comfortably ahead of the National Gallery at approximately 4.9 million. Both figures climbed steadily, and by 2020 the British Museum had reached roughly 6.6 million while the National Gallery stood at about 5.8 million. The Tate Modern began the period as the least visited of the three, with just 4.7 million visitors in 2010. Its numbers then increased far more rapidly than the others, overtaking the National Gallery briefly around 2018 before finishing at approximately 5.9 million — almost level with the two long-established galleries.

The bar chart compares the proportion of households with internet access in four countries — the UK, Japan, Brazil and Kenya — in the years 2005 and 2020. Overall, access increased markedly in every country over the fifteen-year period. The UK and Japan led throughout, whereas Kenya, despite the largest relative gain, remained the least connected. In 2005, around 60% of British and Japanese households had internet access, roughly double the figure for Brazil (about 30%) and far ahead of Kenya, where only 8% were connected. By 2020, the UK and Japan had converged at approximately 95%, near-universal coverage. Brazil experienced strong growth to reach about 75% by 2020, narrowing the gap with the leaders. Kenya saw the most dramatic proportional rise — from 8% to roughly 40% — yet it still lagged well behind the other three nations by the end of the period.

The two pie charts illustrate how a country's energy was generated across five sources — coal, gas, nuclear, hydro and renewables — in 2000 and 2020. Overall, the energy mix shifted substantially away from coal towards renewables over the two decades, although gas remained a significant contributor throughout. In 2000, coal was the dominant source, accounting for almost half of all energy produced (48%), followed by gas at roughly a quarter (26%). Nuclear and hydro made up 14% and 8% respectively, while renewables were negligible at just 4%. By 2020, the picture had changed markedly. Coal's share had more than halved to 20%, and renewables had surged to become the second-largest source at 28%, behind gas, which had grown slightly to 30%. Nuclear and hydro remained broadly stable, together representing under a fifth of the total.

The table compares average monthly household spending, in US dollars, on four categories — housing, food, transport and leisure — across three cities: Tokyo, Mumbai and Lagos. Overall, housing was the largest expense in every city, while spending was highest in Tokyo across almost all categories and lowest in Lagos. Households in Tokyo spent by far the most on housing, at around $1,800 per month — roughly three times the figure in Mumbai ($600) and over four times that in Lagos ($420). Food followed a similar pattern, with Tokyo residents spending about $700 against $300 and $250 in the other two cities. Transport and leisure accounted for smaller and more comparable sums. Notably, leisure was the one category where Mumbai ($150) slightly exceeded Lagos ($90), though both remained far below Tokyo's $400.

The diagram illustrates the process by which used glass bottles are recycled and returned to shops as new products. Overall, recycling glass is a linear process comprising seven main stages, beginning with the collection of used bottles and ending with the distribution of newly manufactured glassware to retailers. At the first stage, used glass bottles are collected from households and deposited in recycling banks. They are then transported by lorry to a processing plant, where the glass is washed thoroughly to remove any impurities. Once cleaned, the bottles are sorted according to colour. In the subsequent stages, the sorted glass is crushed into small fragments known as cullet. This cullet is then melted in a furnace at extremely high temperatures until it becomes molten. Finally, the molten glass is moulded into new bottles, which are packaged and delivered to shops, ready to be used once again.

The two maps depict the changes that took place in a small coastal village between 1990 and the present day. Overall, the village was transformed from a quiet, largely rural settlement into a developed tourist destination, with agricultural land giving way to housing and leisure facilities. In 1990, the village consisted of a small cluster of houses in the centre, surrounded by farmland to the west and woodland to the east. A single road ran north to south, connecting the village to the coast, where there was an undeveloped beach. By the present day, the area had been substantially built up. The farmland to the west had been cleared to make way for a large housing estate, while a hotel and a car park had been constructed near the beach to accommodate visitors. The original road had been widened, and a new road was added to the east, although the woodland was preserved. The beach itself had been developed with a pier extending into the sea.

The pie chart illustrates the main reasons travellers gave for selecting a holiday destination, while the accompanying table sets out the average amount spent per trip by four age groups. Overall, cost was the single most influential factor in choosing a destination, and spending per trip rose consistently with age, peaking among the oldest travellers. According to the pie chart, price was decisive for 40% of respondents, well ahead of the weather (25%) and local attractions (20%); recommendations from friends and other reasons made up the remaining 15%. The table reveals a clear upward pattern in expenditure by age. Travellers aged 18–29 spent the least, at an average of $600 per trip, rising to $900 for those aged 30–49 and $1,300 for the 50–64 group. Those aged 65 and over spent the most, averaging $1,600 — more than double the youngest group.